Appeals court rules against wilderness groups

This forum is for the discussion of topics of political nature that affect the duning community.

Moderator: Sitewide Forum Moderators

User avatar
Vincent J Brunasso
ASA Co-Founder • Past President
ASA Co-Founder • Past President
Posts: 2723
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2000 8:05 pm
antispam: NO
Please enter the middle number: 7

Appeals court rules against wilderness groups

Post by Vincent J Brunasso » ... s.html.csp

The Salt Lake Tribune

First published Jan 11 2011 08:54PM
Updated Jan 12, 2011 09:34AM

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday dealt a major blow to Utah wilderness groups fighting over who owns a handful of back roads in rural Kane County.

In its decision, the Denver court ruled the Wilderness Society and the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) lacked "prudential standing to sue" over the roads because the groups do not have property rights to the roads.

"The reason we went to court was because the [Bureau of Land Management] wasn’t doing anything to protect the monuments," said Heidi McIntosh, SUWA’s associate director. "Now, with this ruling, it’s really up to the BLM to step up to the plate."

The long-running dispute centers on a Civil War-era mining law, known as R.S. 2477, that granted rights-of-way across public land until it was repealed by congress in 1976. Existing rights-of-way, however, were grandfathered in.

In March 2003, Kane County officials requested the BLM remove road signs closing some routes in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, igniting the debate and years of litigation.

SUWA and the Wilderness Society have fought to protect a number of those primitive tracks.

The court’s two dissenting judges wrote that only allowing the dominant property owner — the United States — to sue over such matters stripped citizens of a voice on the issue.

"When coupled with the inescapable truth that in the past R.S. 2477 rights have been falsely claimed over dry creek beds, horse and hiking trails, and jagged rock outcroppings," one dissenting judge wrote, "the resulting anarchy and chaos in the national parks, national monuments, and federal public lands lying within this circuit is profound.
Vincent J. Brunasso
ASA Co-Founder and past president

“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.”
--Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
5th Gear "Pinned" Member
5th Gear "Pinned" Member
Posts: 614
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:17 pm
Please enter the middle number: 5
Location: Mt. Rose HWY, Reno NV.

Re: Appeals court rules against wilderness groups

Post by HSSC »

A skirmish for our side. =D>

For now............................................ :roll:
Public lands are for public use.
Ken & family
Mt. Rose HWY,Reno NV.

User avatar
6th Gear "Wide Open" Member
6th Gear "Wide Open" Member
Posts: 1548
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 1:14 pm
Please enter the middle number: 5
Location: Vista, CA.

Re: Appeals court rules against wilderness groups

Post by gelwell »

We need the 9th circuit to see the ways of the 10th
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end"


Return to “Political Discussions Only”